This analysis examines textual, historical, and theological aspects of Islam’s foundational sources and prophet from a comparative perspective relevant to biblical studies.

---

---

I. Critique of the Quran: Internal and Textual Concerns 📜

A. Alleged Internal Contradictions (Textual Conflicts)

The Quran is challenged with claims of internal inconsistencies regarding timing, divine instruction, and facts. The standard Muslim resolution often relies on the doctrine of Abrogation (Naskh).

Alleged Contradiction	Conflicting Quranic Passages	Standard Critique
Duration of God’s Day	God’s day is 1,000 years (Surah 22:47; 32:5). VS. God’s day is 50,000 years (Surah 70:4).	Critics note a difference of scale requiring theological explanation.
Angels at Badr	Allah sent down 1,000 angels (Surah 8:9). VS. Later stated He sent down 3,000 (Surah 3:124) and then 5,000 (Surah 3:125) angels.	Resolved by Abrogation—critics argue a perfect author should not need to revise numbers.
Fate of Believers	All will enter Hell (Surah 19:71). VS. Believers will be spared (Surah 15:45).	Interpreted as metaphorically passing over the bridge of Hell in the former verse.
Free Will vs. Predestination	Man is responsible for his actions (Surah 74:38). VS. Allah leads astray whom He wills (Surah 14:4; 16:93).	Critics argue the language leans toward absolute predestination, creating a tension with human accountability.

B. Issues of Textual Transmission and Ordering

• The Uthmanic Recension: The final standardization of the text (c. 650–656 CE) involved selecting and destroying dissenting variant texts. Critics question whether this process ensured the absolute textual purity as originally dictated.
• Abrogation (Naskh): Later revelations supersede earlier ones (Surah 2:106). Critics argue this challenges the perfection and immutability of the divine word.

---

---

II. Critique of Muhammad: Ethics, Morality, and Historical Conduct 🛡️

A. Marriage and Family Life (Ethical Scrutiny)

• The Marriage to Aisha: Historical accounts state Muhammad married Aisha when she was a child (traditionally six years old) with the marriage consummated when she was nine. This is a major point of moral controversy in modern and comparative ethical frameworks, despite the customs of the time.
• Marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh: Muhammad married Zaynab, the divorced wife of his adopted son, Zayd. Critics note that a specific revelation (Surah 33:37) was issued to legitimize this action, which broke an existing social custom.

B. Warfare, Conquest, and the Treatment of Opponents

• The Extermination of the Banu Qurayza (627 CE): Following the siege, all adult males (estimated at 600–900) of the Jewish tribe were executed, and the women and children were enslaved. Critics question the ethical and theological grounds for the mass execution of an entire male population.
• Assassinations: Accounts detail the killing of several outspoken critics of Muhammad, raising ethical questions about the suppression of dissent.

C. Critical Interpretation of Physical Affection and Ghilman

• Controversial Hadith Example (Sunan Abi Dawud 5224): The embrace of Usayd ibn Hudayr after Muhammad prodded him is cited by critics as evidence of an unusually intimate level of physical contact with men.
• Contested Narratives of Intimate Physical Contact with Children: Narrations describing Muhammad sucking on the tongue or lips of his young grandsons (Al-Hasan and Al-Husayn) are viewed by critics as ethically problematic, despite traditional interpretations of this being an act of compassion to relieve thirst.
• The Ghilman of Paradise: The Quran’s description of eternally youthful boys (ghilman) serving the saved is sometimes critically interpreted as catering to homosexual desire, though Muslim scholars view them as purely chaste servants.

---

III. Scientific and Cosmological Errors in the Quran 🔭

A. Errors in Cosmology and Astronomy

Verse/Concept	Quranic Description	Modern Scientific Critique
Sun’s Setting Place	“Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water…” (Surah 18:86)	Critiqued as a clear factual error reflecting a pre-scientific, flat-Earth worldview where the sun has a literal “setting place.”
Sky’s Structure	The sky is described as a “protected ceiling” (saqfan mahfooẓan – Surah 21:32) and is held up “without supports that you can see” (Surah 13:2).	Critics argue this reflects a belief in a solid, physical dome or firmament, contradicting the modern understanding of the atmosphere and space.
Earth’s Stabilization	Mountains were placed on Earth as “pegs” or “stakes” (autādan – Surah 78:7) to prevent it from shaking (an tamīda bikum – Surah 16:15).	Modern geology confirms that mountains are formed by the very tectonic forces that cause earthquakes (instability), not by an external stabilizing force.
Creation Order	Surah 41:9-12 seems to place the full creation of the Earth and its sustenance before the final formation and adornment of the heavens (stars).	Scientific consensus holds that stars and the stellar material existed before the formation of Earth, posing a chronological conflict.

B. Error in Biology/Embryology

• Semen Origin (Qur’an 86:6-7): Man is created from a fluid that issues from “between the loins and the ribs.” Critics point out that sperm originates in the testes, not between the backbone and the sternum.
• Traditional Defense: Islamic apologists contend that these descriptions are either metaphorical, referring to the visual perception of the observer, or relate to the embryonic origin/development path of the organs in the body.

---

IV. The Manner of Death: The “Aorta Hadith” Controversy 💀

Traditional sources suggest Muhammad died from a lingering effect of poisoning that occurred four years prior, which critics connect to a Quranic test for a false prophet.

Source	The Quranic Test for a False Prophet	Muhammad’s Deathbed Statement
Quran (69:44-46)	“And if he had made up about Us some [false] sayings, We would have seized him by the right hand; Then We would have cut from him the aorta.” (The word for aorta/life-vein is al-watin or abhar).	Sahih al-Bukhari 4428: Narrated Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O ‘Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaybar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.”
The Contradiction	The Quran presents the instantaneous “cutting of the aorta” as God’s kill switch for a fraudulent messenger.	On his deathbed, Muhammad described his mortal pain using the exact phrase the Quran stated would be the fate of a false prophet.
The Critique	Critics argue this represents a profound self-destructive irony in the Islamic sources—that Muhammad died with the very physical sensation designated by his own scripture as divine judgment on a fraud.
The Traditional Defense	Muslim scholars argue that the death was a noble form of martyrdom (dying from the delayed effects of an enemy’s poison). They contend that the phrase “aorta being cut” (qata’a al-watin) was an idiomatic expression in Arabic for extreme, mortal pain, and not a literal fulfillment of the Quranic judgment.

---

V. Theological Divergence: Key Differences Between the Bible and the Quran ✝️

The foundational conflicts between Islam and Christianity stem from irreconcilable differences concerning the nature of God, the role and identity of Jesus, and the path to salvation.

Doctrine	Biblical/Christian Position	Quranic/Islamic Position	Fundamental Conflict
The Nature of God	Trinitarian Monotheism: God is one essence existing in three co-equal, co-eternal Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.	Absolute Unitarianism (Tawhid): God (Allah) is absolutely one; the concept of the Trinity is strictly rejected as Shirk (polytheism).	The Quran condemns the Christian understanding of God as a violation of divine oneness (Surah 4:171).
Identity of Jesus Christ	Divine Son: Jesus is the unique, eternal Son of God, fully God and fully man (Incarnation). He is the central figure for salvation.	Mortal Prophet (Isa): Jesus is a revered prophet (rasūl) and messenger of Allah, born of a virgin, but is not God or the Son of God.	The divinity of Christ is rejected; Jesus’s role is demoted from Deity/Savior to a preparatory messenger.
Crucifixion & Resurrection	Historical Fact and Atonement: Jesus died on the cross, resurrecting bodily on the third day to provide Atonement for the sins of humanity.	Substitution Denial: Jesus was not crucified; a substitute was made to look like him (Surah 4:157). He was instead raised directly to heaven.	The entire basis of Christian salvation (vicarious suffering and substitutionary atonement) is explicitly denied and replaced with a divine illusion.
Salvation (The Path)	Grace through Faith: Salvation is a gift received through faith in Jesus Christ’s completed work on the cross (Ephesians 2:8-9).	Works and Allah’s Mercy: Salvation is earned through the balance of one’s good deeds and is ultimately dependent on the unmerited mercy and will of Allah.	Christianity relies on the perfect finished work of Christ; Islam relies on human effort and divine decree.
Status of Previous Scripture	Divine Preservation: The Bible (Torah, Psalms, Gospels) is the preserved, inspired, and authoritative Word of God for all time.	Textual Corruption (Tahrif): The original revelations given to Moses (Tawrat) and Jesus (Injil) were authentic, but the current Bible has been corrupted/altered by Jews and Christians.	The Quran views itself as the final, perfect correction to the corrupted prior scriptures.

---

VI. Chronological & Theological Implausibility (Jesus and the Quran) 🕰️

The Quran’s accounts of Jesus are structurally and chronologically separated from the events they describe, presenting a significant theological challenge.

The Late Date of Revelation

• Jesus’s Life and Crucifixion: Circa 4 BCE – 33 CE.
• Quranic Revelations: Began circa 610 CE and concluded in 632 CE.
• The Time Gap: The Quran’s corrective narrative regarding Jesus’s nature, mission, and death was delivered over five centuries after the events are alleged to have taken place.

The Theological Implication of Correction

The Quran’s late date means its claims—particularly the denial of the Crucifixion in Surah 4:157—are not contemporary historical accounts, but rather a later, revised theological narrative.

This position requires the wholesale rejection of:

1. The New Testament: All four canonical Gospels and the writings of Paul affirm the physical death and resurrection of Jesus.
2. Early Christian Tradition: The Crucifixion was the central tenet of the Christian movement from the 1st century CE onward.
3. Historical Consensus: Even non-Christian historians of the era (e.g., Tacitus, Josephus) acknowledge the execution of Jesus under Pontius Pilate.

For the Quran’s account of Jesus to be accepted, one must conclude that God waited six centuries to reveal that the foundational, central event of the world’s most widespread religion at that time (the Crucifixion) was based on a divine illusion or an error of observation.