Content Navigator ๐Ÿงญ Search our detailed Charts, Graphs, Guidelines, & Maps by Topic. Full page List!

The Search for the Exodus Pharaoh

The Search for the Exodus Pharaoh: An Investigative Deep Dive

The Book of Exodus famously does not name the Pharaoh who battled Moses and suffered the ten plagues. This anonymity has fueled centuries of debate. By combining the internal chronology of the Bible with specific requirements derived from the Exodus narrative, we can build a strong case for a highly probable candidate: Amenhotep II (reigned c. 1450โ€“1425 BC).

Our investigation followed a rigorous process, starting with the biblical timeline and ending with a final, crucial genealogical requirement.


Part I: Establishing the Biblical Timeline and Initial Requirements

To begin the search, we must rely on the Bible’s own chronological anchor, which supports the “Early Date” for the Exodus.

The Biblical Timeline Anchor

The date of the Exodus is fixed by:

  • 1 Kings 6:1 (KJV): “And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, he began to build the house of the LORD.”
  • Dating: Based on the accepted dating of Solomon’s reign, this verse places the Exodus around 1446 BC. This date points to the 18th Dynasty of the Egyptian New Kingdom.

Initial Biblical Requirements

We identified two distinct Pharaohs in the Exodus narrative: the Oppressor (who was alive when Moses fled) and the Exodus Pharaoh (who experienced the plagues).

RequirementPre-Exodus Pharaoh (The Oppressor)Exodus Pharaoh (The Defeated)
1. Reign LengthMust have ruled long enough for Moses’ 40 years in Midian, and die during that period (Exodus 2:23).N/A
2. Loss of FirstbornN/AHis firstborn son must have died in the 10th plague (Exod. 12:29-30).
3. Timeline FitMust rule before the 1446 BC Exodus date.Must rule during the 1446 BC Exodus date.

Initial Candidate Review (1446 BC Window)

PharaohReign Dates (Approx.)Meets Req. 1?Meets Req. 3?Role Identified
Thutmose III1479โ€“1425 BC (54 years)Yes (54-year reign covers Moses’ 40 years).No (Died before 1446 BC date).The Oppressor
Amenhotep II1450โ€“1425 BC (25 years)N/AYes (Reigns during 1446 BC).The Exodus Pharaoh

Part II: The Final, Crucial Requirement

After the initial review, we noted a critical detail from the text: the Pharaoh survived the ten plagues and personally pursued the Israelites to the Red Sea.

This fact necessitates adding a final, critical constraint to the Exodus Pharaoh’s identity:

The Added Requirement (Req. 4)

  • Requirement 4: Non-Firstborn Status
    • Reasoning: If the Pharaoh had been his father’s firstborn son, he would have been struck and killed by the tenth plague, which targeted the firstborn of every house, “from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne” (Exodus 12:29, KJV). To survive the plague, the Pharaoh of the Exodus himself must have been a later-born son of his father.

Part III: The Conclusion for Amenhotep II

When we apply the refined criteria (Requirements 2, 3, and 4) to Amenhotep II, the historical evidence aligns perfectly with the biblical narrative:

Biblical RequirementAmenhotep II (Historical Fit)Coherence with Exodus
Req. 2: Loss of FirstbornPerfect Fit: Amenhotep II’s official crown prince (likely his eldest son) died unexpectedly, leading to an irregular succession by his younger son, Thutmose IV.The death of the designated heir perfectly matches the Death of the Firstborn Plague (Exod. 12:29).
Req. 3: Timeline FitPerfect Fit: His reign (1450โ€“1425 BC) contains the 1446 BC Exodus date.Aligns with the terminus a quo (starting point) derived from 1 Kings 6:1.
Req. 4: Non-Firstborn StatusPerfect Fit: Amenhotep II was NOT the firstborn of Thutmose III. His elder brother, Amenemhat, was the firstborn heir but died before ascending the throne.Amenhotep II would have been exempt from the final plague, allowing him to survive and pursue the Israelites (Exod. 14:8).

Final Conclusion

While the Bible purposefully leaves the Pharaoh unnamed, the evidence, when strictly filtered through the internal chronological and genealogical data of the Book of Exodus, points overwhelmingly to Amenhotep II as the most likely historical figure to have been defeated by the power of God during the great Exodus.

The biblical silence on his name ensures that the focus of the story remains on the ultimate Sovereign: The LORD, who triumphed over Pharaoh and his entire host (Psalm 136:15).